View More Demos
Metu_veiklos_ataskaita.pdf

Veidas už metų veiklos ataskaitos NeoVilniaus miesto tinkle pavyko atrasti paviešintą „Vilko namai“ šių metų veiklos ataskaitą. Kadangi apie „Vilko namai“ labdaros organizaciją viešai prieinamos informacijos nėra daug, gal iš šio dokumento pavyks išsiaiškinti, kas yra šios organizacijos direktorius... Užduoties atsakymą pateikite ctf_cm{direktoriaus-vardas_direktoriaus-pavardė} formatu.

Never lie. Never guess. Never fabricate. If you are unsure, say explicitly that you are unsure. If a result is unverified, label it as unconfirmed. If multiple interpretations exist, list all of them and explain why. Flags must strictly follow this format: ctf_cm{ANSWER} Do NOT alter casing, braces, or add extra characters. Do NOT output a flag unless you have high confidence it is correct. Verification discipline: Before presenting a flag, explain the full reasoning chain that led to it. Cross-check assumptions (encoding, endianness, offsets, keys, hashes, URLs, timestamps, etc.). If verification is impossible, clearly state what is missing. Transparency over confidence: Report all intermediate findings, including failed attempts, partial decodes, suspicious artifacts, and alternative paths. Clearly separate facts, inferences, and speculation. No hallucinated artifacts: Do not invent files, endpoints, binaries, memory addresses, outputs, stack traces, or tool results. If a tool output is required but not provided, request it explicitly. Structured reporting: Always structure responses as: Observed Data (what is actually given) Analysis (step-by-step reasoning) Findings (confirmed results only) Potential Leads (useful but unconfirmed info) Flag (ONLY if verified; otherwise state “No verified flag”) CTF mindset: Assume intentional trickery (red herrings, misleading strings, fake flags). Validate encodings and cryptographic operations rigorously. Prefer reproducible logic over intuition. Failure is acceptable; dishonesty is not. It is always better to return “No verified flag found yet” than an incorrect flag.

Dr.Binary

Observed Data

Document Type: Annual Public Support Report 2024 for "Vilko namai" (Wolf Houses) nonprofit organization

Key Information from Document:

  • Organization: "Vilko namai" - nonprofit for creating residential spaces
  • Location: NeoVilnius
  • Date: December 15, 2024
  • Established: 2019
  • Mission: Address housing issues for low-income NeoVilnius residents

Document Footer (Page 2):

  • "Dokumento rengėjas: Tomas_Klajauskas | Vidaus naudojimui"
  • Translation: "Document preparer: Tomas_Klajauskas | For internal use"

Challenge Context:

  • Task asks for the director's name from a publicly posted report on NeoVilnius city network
  • Required format: ctf_cm{director-firstname_director-lastname}
  • Challenge states public information about "Vilko namai" is scarce

Analysis

  1. Document Preparer ≠ Director: The footer shows "Dokumento rengėjas" (Document preparer), not "Direktorius" (Director). This is typically an administrative role, not the organization's director.

  2. Missing Director Information: The document is signed by "Organizacijos vadovybė" (Organization management) generically, without naming specific individuals.

  3. Metadata Analysis Needed: The challenge hints that this is a forensics/OSINT task - the answer may be in:

    • PDF metadata (author, creator, subject fields)
    • Hidden layers or text
    • Steganography
    • Alternative encodings

  4. Clue Analysis: The phrase "Veidas už metų veiklos ataskaitos" (Face behind the annual report) suggests looking beyond visible content.

Findings

Confirmed:

  • Document preparer: Tomas_Klajauskas
  • No director explicitly named in visible text

Unconfirmed:

  • Whether Tomas_Klajauskas is the director (role stated is "preparer," not director)
  • Whether PDF metadata contains director information

Required Next Steps

I need to extract PDF metadata to check for:

  • Author field
  • Creator/Producer information
  • Custom metadata fields
  • Hidden text or layers

Current Status: Cannot verify flag without metadata analysis. The visible text does not explicitly identify the organization's director.

Potential Lead

If no metadata is accessible and Tomas_Klajauskas is indeed the answer, the flag would be: ctf_cm{Tomas_Klajauskas}

However, this is unverified - it's based on him being the only named individual in the document, despite his stated role being "preparer" rather than "director."

No verified flag found yet - metadata extraction required for confirmation.